top of page
  • Writer's picturescottforbes

Insurrection by the Silent Enemy

We have the entire Capitol Hill area of Seattle that was held hostage, with buildings boarded, businesses closed, and the area flooded with protestors and graffiti. Antifa claims to be an anti-fascist organization, but to many is itself fascist, operating with impunity, wherever they choose. Black Lives Matters (BLM) protests turn violent, with many people bused-in and paid to participate including the professional agitators. Donations to BLM have skyrocketed, but where is the money going? The majority of the network TV, cable news, and print media present protest events as peaceful, when we can all see with our own eyes differently. Athletes are taking a knee to the National Anthem and other people burning the American Flag, which to many shows disrespect for those who have given their lives for our country. Statues of historical people are being deemed racist and torn down, essentially visually wiping out history. Politicians side with protestors and allow large groups to congregate, yet they refuse to allow children to access playgrounds, people to visit loved ones dying or attend funerals, except that of George Floyd. The Mayor of NYC spent tax payer dollars to paint “Black Lives Matter” in front of the Trump Tower. Some of the loudest voices want police forces defunded and officers are openly being confronted and attacked. NYC even downgraded the crime of assaulting a police officer to a misdemeanor. The DOJ has dropped the case against General Michael Flynn, yet Judge Sullivan refuses even against a recent ruling by the Circuit Court. Google is constantly demonetizing conservative publications like the Federalist and Zero Hedge and YouTube makes us log in to view videos made by conservatives. Aunt Jemima syrup is being removed by its manufacturer from the market because Quaker Oats says it’s based on a racial stereotype. Oregon and other states made it a requirement to wear a mask when outdoors, even if not in the vicinity of another human being—and even when the World Health Organization and medical professionals warn that a person is not receiving enough oxygen when wearing a mask, and in particular should not exercise wearing a mask.

Who in their right mind is not asking what the hell is going on and why. How did we get to where we are today? Well, I’ll try to give one man’s perspective below.

In his open letter of June 7th, the past Vatican ambassador to the US, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, writes, “In recent months we have been witnessing the formation of two opposing sides that I would call Biblical: the children of light and the children of darkness. The children of light constitute the most conspicuous part of humanity, while the children of darkness represent an absolute minority. And yet the former are the object of a sort of discrimination which places them in a situation of moral inferiority with respect to their adversaries, who often hold strategic positions in government, in politics, in the economy and in the media.”

He continues, “In an apparently inexplicable way, the good are held hostage by the wicked and by those who help them either out of self-interest or fearfulness. These two sides, which have a Biblical nature, follow the clear separation between the offspring of the Woman and the offspring of the Serpent. On the one hand there are those who, although they have a thousand defects and weaknesses, are motivated by the desire to do good, to be honest, to raise a family, to engage in work, to give prosperity to their homeland, to help the needy, and, in obedience to the Law of God, to merit the Kingdom of Heaven. On the other hand, there are those who serve themselves, who do not hold any moral principles, who want to demolish the family and the nation, exploit workers to make themselves unduly wealthy, foment internal divisions and wars, and accumulate power and money: for them the fallacious illusion of temporal well-being will one day – if they do not repent – yield to the terrible fate that awaits them, far from God, in eternal damnation.”

The destruction of peoples’ livelihoods, the burning of businesses and personal property, the personal and physical attacks on those with opposing views, the negativity and violence towards police, and all forms of violence are not actions of those grounded in a set of moral and ethical boundaries backed by a religion or societal norms and laws. It’s quite the contrary, as the Archbishop says. What we are witnessing is evil on display

Yet, it is not a single person, organization or force. Rather, we are dealing with a wide-scale insurrection supported by many entities, each trying to take their cut, having varying end-objectives, but a similarly-based ideology or belief system. Let me repeat. The people perpetrating the insurrection are operating under the same belief system. This is why it can appear so coordinated. Until people understand this and question the “whys” and say “no” to the “hows” it will continue unabated. Yes, we do not live in a perfect society. Yes, racism exists. And yes, colonialism was devastating to indigenous people around the world. We do have work to do to move our collective conscientious to a higher plateau and must for the sake of the planet and humanity. But, is that really the objective of the insurrection. In my opinion, no. So, what is it?

The reality is that we do know that evil has existed since the beginning of time. Evil exists because to some their beliefs and actions are acceptable within and in support of their ideology. Behaviors such as pedophilia, incest, lying, stealing, sex trafficking, abusing a person or animal, the destruction of another person’s property, and even murder are acceptable to some because they receive something in return. This might be hard for some to believe or accept as rational, because to most people these behaviors are unacceptable. Remember, it is not what we believe. It is what they believe. I will repeat. It is what they believe. Most people are trying to survive day to day, oblivious of what really is taking place in the world around them and who is controlling its trajectory and why. Can you blame people for not knowing? Yes, frankly. A fair number of people oblivious to what is really going on are very intelligent and accomplished. So, yes. I blame them for their consent.

So, why is it that seemingly rational and intelligent people believe it’s acceptable for parts of cities to be destroyed? Why do we accept that politicians lie? I had a friend say to me years ago that “the end justifies the means.” But, why so, if the means is based on a lie? Why does it seem today that some people in business, government, the news media, science, and other systems of society are short on ethics, morality, lie, yet few in the power-circles of society seem to get in trouble? Why is it that human and sex trafficking is the second most profitable of criminal enterprises, behind drugs? If all of this is wrong to the majority, why does such behavior still exist? The answer is short and sweet. It exists because people in power allow it to happen because they personally benefit. They get a cut of the action.

One explanation for the foundation for some of the evil in society today may lie in a cult initiated and formed in Eastern Europe by Sabbatai Sevi (1626–76), known as the “False Messiah,” and a century later followed by Jacob Frank (1726–91), the father of Frankism. Sabbatai Sevi came along during the Khmelnytsky Uprising of 1648-1654, when ethnic cleansing of Jews was rampant. He lived in what is modern-day Turkey, proclaimed himself as the new Messiah in 1666, and gained a huge following in Asia Minor and Eastern Europe. At the peak of his fame and popularity, Sevi had a following of over one million believers--half the world’s Jewish population during the 17th century. Because of his power and influence, Sevi asked the Turkish Sultan to hand him the land of Jerusalem for his people. The ruler of the Ottoman Empire instead confronted Sevi with the alternative of choosing either to be executed or convert to Islam. When Sevi chose to convert and to not die as a Sabbatian martyr, he consequently lost his influence and respect among his followers and died in obscurity.

About one hundred years later, Jacob Frank (born Jakub Lejbowicz) revived the Sabbatian cult with the claim that he was the “true” new Messiah. In the Eastern European world at the time, people longed for deliverance and a leader, hence his message aroused an enthusiastic following. Frank could make his followers believe that he was not just another kind of Sabbatai Sevi but the true messenger of redemption. He would say that Sevi was too weak to find the true way. Jacob Frank, in contrast, would be their savior. Frank shaped the ideology or "way of a Frankist" which in its basic form is to be deceitful and spread confusion in the quest for such redemption. A key characteristic of a Frankist follower is that they must carry the “burden of silence” and remain clandestine. To them, “holy knowledge” and enlightenment can only come when the “burden of silence” gets carried to its fullest.

Frankism eventually became even more of a mass movement than that of the one million or so Sabbateans, fed by the burning desire of Frank's followers to construct a “new world order.” Like his predecessor Sevi, Jacob Frank preached purification through transgression--an act that goes against a law, rule, or code of conduct. Essentially few laws existed in Frankism. Frank preached the desecration of what is considered to be holy, such as the Talmud or the Bible, and promoted sexual excesses amongst his followers, with sex orgies often part of their gatherings.

Coming out of the Jewish tradition, the Frankists challenged the Judaic Talmud and the rule of the Rabbis. The Rabbis had no choice but to proclaim a universal Cherem or excommunication against all Frankist "impenitent heretics," and made it obligatory upon every pious Jew to seek-out the Frankists and expose them. Seeking cover, Frank told Mikołaj Dembowski, the Catholic Bishop of Kamieniec Podolski, Poland, that he rejected the Talmud and recognized only the sacred book of Kabbalah, the Zohar, which did not contradict the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. Much of the cult’s beliefs were established long before Sevi and Frank, but began in Babylon in the sixth century BC, with the advent of the Jewish heresy of the Labbalah. Nevertheless, Frank and his Polish followers were offered protection by the Bishop, if they agreed to convert to Catholicism. They did, but this was of course another Frankist deception.

After 1758, following Jacob Frank's conversion, many of his followers in Central and Eastern Europe convertedto Catholicism, and some eventually became leaders in the Roman Catholic Church, but clandestinely they never gave up their Frankist ideology. Such an insurrection was true in Western Europe, where the Sabbatians wore the cloak of Judaism. In parts of the Middle East and Western Asia, the Sabbatians cloaked themselves as Muslim. According to the great rabbinical scholar, Golem Scholem, “Frankism shattered the world of traditional Judaism beyond repair.” We might want to ask whether 300 years later after the Balfour Declaration that Sevi’s dream of ruling Jerusalem actually did come true. One must also ask what damage might have been done to Catholicism and Islam by the Frankists who infiltrated to high levels within each.

The Frankism tradition has been carried on not by individuals but through bloodline families to this present day, according to Scholem. (Scholem, part VIII). This is a hugely important point to grasp. The bloodline families that Scholem cites, many of them rooted in Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, had largely a very wealthy background and high rabbinical learnings, hence could cloak their true beliefs. It's believed by numerous researchers that a union of Jacob Frank and Adam Weishaupt, with the wealth and backing of the Rothschild family, birthed May 1, 1776 the “Orden der Perfektibilisten,” also known as the Illuminati of Bavaria, that many believe is the center-stage of modern-day secret societies, with members being the “new world order” proponents and the elite “controllers of society.” It is widely thought that Lord Mayer Rothschild convinced Weishaupt to adopt the Frankist’s methods, at a minimum, in pursuit of their aims of abolishing ordered governments, private property and inheritances, patriotism and nationalism, family life and the institution of marriage, all established religions, and to establish communal state-run education for children. How else establish a “one world government” but with stealth and manufactured societal chaos.

According to Scholem, the Frankist movement still remains very secretive and elitist. This select group, he says, enjoys an “extra spirit” that allows the believer to no longer be subject to the standards and obligations of his time and to be free from the demands of the laws and conventions of the society in which they live—Frankists essentially make up their own rules and disavow the established rules of society. What a Frankist believes is acceptable behavior is not what most in society believe, but it is their reality. It is what they believe, but not what is taught to most in society. If one thinks the Frankism ideology cannot possibly exist to this day, just remember that Christianity and Judaism have existed for far longer than Frankism.

All of what is showing itself in society, on our streets, in social media, the news media, and the halls of Congress didn’t happen overnight and it’s clearly not organic. It’s organized, orchestrated, and financed by those exercising supremecy over the world’s governments, as well as economies, and even cultures.

Did the founder of the Frankist cult movement, Jacob Frank, cement a belief system or ideology that has existed for centuries after him, perpetuated by specific elite bloodline families, like the Rothschilds and Frankist followers—and even many of the “robber-barons” of the 19th century? Could the elite in society--whether we call them the Illuminati, Frankists, or some other name--be so bent on destroying society just to gain more wealth and control? Have we all become victims to their expertise in deceit, while remaining clandestine, spreading confusion, and carrying on with the Frankist’s “burden of silence?” How many wars and staged events have they executed to achieve their ideological objectives? If Frank’s followers numbered several million in the 1700’s, what do they number today in terms of people deprived of any moral or ethical restraints? Are they the “silent enemy” to whom President Trump refers.


bottom of page